Blagojevich Getting It Done!

Rod Blagojevich has been making the kind of changes we had been anticipating for 30 years of Republican governors.  With his 2002 victory we realized what life could be like with a Democrat leading the state government.  We as Democrats had very high hopes for the Blagojevich administration and he has delivered.  He has taken up the cause of many of the concerns we all had including health care, minimum wage, stem cell research, passing GLBT legislation to protect against discrimination, expanding pre-school programs, and funding for the vast array of social services and human rights programs that make the quality of life in Illinois better.

Topinka, our current state treasurer, on the other hand has not demonstrated anything in her tenure that would make for a reason to vote for her.  She has worked hard to try to take advantage of Blagojevich missteps and potential problems but that is a campaign to not vote for Blagojevich.  She has failed to give anyone a reason to vote for her.

When the polls close on Tuesday, Nov. 7 I believe we will se a huge Blagojevich victory and the government of Illinois will continue to be lead by Democrats.  The question then becomes what to do with that power.

I have at least three issues that I would like to see addressed.  We all need to be very concerned about the general finances of the state. When Blagojevich came in he faced a five billion dollar deficit.  He has managed to move things forward, but at what cost?  It seems to me that rather than address the issues today, we have decided to delay those decisions into the future.  The governor needs to develop a plan to address the long-term financial situation.  No new taxes makes that even more difficult, but whatever the options are we need a plan that will protect the programs we have long waited for and keeps the state in sound financial shape.

While he is addressing the financial future a second problem that must be addressed is the funding of education.  Without the 7% tax cap and with property values significantly up the burden of property taxes is growing heavy on most citizens of Illinois.  A plan to change the way schools are funded that decreases the reliance on property tax is necessary.

Finally, a third item that needs to be on the Governors agenda is tax increment financing reforms.  TIF's can and have played a valuable role in development of some areas that may not have seen development otherwise.  That does not mean that TIF's are appropriate for every area that wants development.  Some should have the assistance, but most should be able to develop without it.  The revenues also need to be better understood and utilized so that their is appropriate and transparent use of the funds.

I believe that there are other things that need to be addressed and new issues will arise.  I know that there will be some issue we just will not all agree upon, but I also have no doubt that we will all be better off with Blagojevich as our governor.


Go Democrats!

Todd Stroger Turns It On!

 As the election draws near, the campaign of Todd Stroger has grown into something we can all support.  The social issues are only the tip of the iceberg, but they do bear repeating.  Only Todd Stroger is pro-choice, pro-GLBT and in favor of gun control.  His position on reforming the Office of the Inspector General is a very strong stance on changing the culture at the county.  While there may be a need for the FBI and the US Attorney in some cases, the long-term solution is to cure the problem from within.  This initiative will provide a long-term solution.  Stroger has also stepped up and delivered a plan to restore the publics confidence, and more importantly the children’s welfare, at the Juvenile Temporary Detention Center.  A solid plan that goes even farther than President Steele has gone in her bold moves to improve the quality of the facility.

Stroger has also been busy picking up endorsements.  Personal PAC the strongest pro-choice committee in Chicago supports Stroger.  The Chicago Federation of Labor supports Stroger for President because of his record of supporting working people.  The Independent Voters of Illinois - Independent Precinct Organization, the longest and best-known progressive and independent organization in the city, has endorsed and support Todd Stroger.  Stroger also pledged to be a full-time County Board President, and given the tremendous challenges ahead of the County I cannot see how anyone could hope to get the job done any other way.

Locally, many of our most thoughtful and respected office holders have endorsed Stroger.  Those people include:  Cong. Jan Schakowsky, Comm. Larry Suffredin, and Comm. Mike Quigley not only three former Claypool supporters, but also his campaign manager.

The tide seemed to turn at a September 25, 2006 debate where Stroger stepped up his game and took his issues hard to his opponent.  The election is drawing near.  Our Democratic candidate is hitting his stride and reminding us who we are, what we stand for and what we believe in. 

Go Democrats!

Brown In The Race for Mayor

The mayoral race is on the way and this city election season has the promise to be something much more significant than any mayoral race has been since 1989.  With Dorothy Brown in the race already Mayor Daley is guaranteed a stronger race than he has seen in many years.  If Jesse Jackson, Jr., Luis Gutierrez and some have said Mike Quigley get into the race it could be a fascinating election season.

Dorothy Brown represents a different kind of politician.  She is not someone who spent years working her way to the top of someone else’s organization.  She is a self-made woman who has proven she is a person of integrity, strong character and has proven skills in leadership and management of a large public office.  In some ways that makes her more qualified than the other challengers.  Running an organization that has well over 30,000 employees is a huge undertaking.  Experience in managing a large organization will be one of her strengths as she campaigns for mayor.

As a Ward Committeeman I am very encouraged to see that there is the very good possibility that we will have some choices for mayor that will present various styles and viewpoints about where our city should be going.  Now lets see who else enters into this race.  There is only 10 weekends to go to collect the petitions.

Tribune Decides What Council Shouldn't Address

A very slanted editorial appeared today in the Chicago Tribune blasting Joe Moore for his work on the “Big Box” minimum wage ordinance and the “Foie Gras” ban.  In the article it ignores the fact that both of these ordinances passed the city council, not only with a majority, but also with a significant majority of the members voting in favor.  These are not ordinances that are unpopular with the body. Even after heavy lobbying, bashing the ordinance for weeks, and vetoing the “Big Box”, it still enjoys the support of a significant majority of the Alderman.  Of note is the fact that of the three Daley was able to switch over to uphold his veto, two are H.D.O. owned and operated Aldermen and the third is increasingly looking like she has some serious moral and ethics issues.

But even if you feel that the two Moore ordinances are insignificant, misguided, and/or inappropriate for a local city council to consider, ask yourself this:  Who is it that is really driving the foie gras to be a day to day story?  Here are the facts.  A quick search of the Sun-Times website shows that since September 7 the Sun-Times has printed 9 stories about foie gras.  I can tell you that Joe Moore has initiated two press conferences on the issue during the entire life of this issue, once for the initial vote and once when it became clear that it was going to be considered for repeal by Ald. Natarus and Ald. Stone.  What is fascinating is the number of times the paper who finds this issue so incredibly inappropriate has done a story related to this issue.  The number of time the Chicago Tribune has written something about Foie Gras during this same period of less than a month is 33.  It was reported on WBEZ’s 848 program that on the day the ban went into effect that the Chicago Tribune covered the story that day with 6 reporters.  That sounds like a major news story, not something insignificant.  I think it is clear that the Tribune is using this issue and “big box” to drive its own agenda forward.

Ask yourself this, “What right does the Tribune have to decide what is an appropriate for the City Council?”  Where is their objectivity?  There is none, and that is my point.  Because it is an editorial it doesn’t require objectivity.  But as a reader you should know that it is opinion, an opinion that is not any more important or significant than your own. You should understand that they do have an agenda and it has been much the same agenda for a very long time.  It is a pro-establishment, pro-big business, pro-Republican/Bush, pro-big guy, and a pro-conservative agenda.  The 49th Ward is none of those things and neither is most of the city.  If you are not Republican, if you’re not conservative, if you live in the city rather than the suburbs, if you are a progressive, a Democrat, a liberal, pro-worker and pro-union person you should be looking elsewhere for leadership and opinion on these issues.

There are some problems that need to be addressed in the ward. Many issues have already been addressed and resolved, but even when those few items mentioned in the editorial are resolved, there will be others to replace them. The ward will never be perfect so there will always be another issue in front of any Alderman. Ward issues are being addressed. That doesn’t mean that nothing beyond the boundaries of the Ward should ever be addressed. That is simply what the Chicago Tribune would like. That doesn’t make it true nor does it make the way things should be done.

Do you care about these issues?  Do you think they should never be discussed at the city council?  I have to agree with you who have said that the Tribune is being a bully using its big stick to try and force public opinion in its direction.  There are several issues they are championing. Let's see how it works out when we, not the editorial board members have the final say.

The Last Day

Today ends an era.  Even the Trib, the strongest critic, had to say you deserved respect.  I don't agree with everything they write about your administration. They overstate some things to further their political agenda, but the comments about your character are right on point.  John H. Stroger, Jr.,  you are one of a kind, and a kind that with your leaving public life I doubt we will see again.  I never wondered where I  stood or where you stood on something. And most of the time you were right in the end.   You are blessed with many admirable qualities.  It was hard when I didn't agree with your position, because you don't change your mind easily, but you have always given me a chance to try and do so.  You listen.  You care.  And the millions of people who benefit from your steadfast dedication to providing for the less fortunate will be cared for through the good works of others in public service for a long time to come.  You have changed the lives of many simply by setting a good example.


Chicago Tribune Editorial           July 31, 2006          President Strogers Last Day In Office

Monday begins as thousands upon thousands of other days have begun in this metropolis, with John Stroger as president of the Cook County Board. Monday night, he'll begin his retirement. After decades of influencing county government and the lives of the people it serves, he has been sidelined by medical issues beyond his control. If John Stroger ever anticipated a career farewell, he surely saw himself shaking hands with everyone--his allies, his adversaries, the bypassers captivated if only for a moment by one of the more genuine personalities in Chicago politics.

But he likely didn't anticipate a farewell. He wouldn't have enjoyed those elaborate exercises in staged finality. Politics and governance were his life; an intimate says the prospect of retirement unnerved him. As Stroger now moves on he'll be busier than he ever expected, rebuilding his strength after a stroke and, bet it all, charming every physical therapist he meets. The rest of us--the allies, the adversaries, the bypassers--will have to wait a while longer for those handshakes. Even in this awkward moment of silence, we know he leaves public office just as he occupied it: without a grudge, without a complaint, and with precious few regrets. Even at his most stubborn--like an Arkansas mule, he once boasted--he has heard out his foes. The man does have convictions. Some of the most confrontational meetings this newspaper's editorial board ever has hosted occurred with John Stroger at the table, loudly refusing to reduce bureaucracy and improve services in a featherbedded county government that always took care of his cronies. The final trajectory of those meetings was predictable: Stroger agreeing to disagree, firmly gripping every paw in the room, murmuring that no matter how fierce his intransigence, "Nothing personal." When any disagreement ends with those two words spoken honestly--which rarely they are--they ennoble the speaker and the listener alike. If arguments with Stroger never have been personal, everything else has: How's everybody doing here? You have two boys, right? What's up with my old friend so-and-so? The Chicago cliche is that Stroger, 77, is a relic of an era when taxpayers blindly tolerated subsidizing the agendas, the patronage and the insider contracts awarded by the county officials they elected to office. But he's also a relic of a steelier, less calculating politics in which loyalty, once granted, endured to the grave. In 2003, he explained in an interview the most controversial decision of his career: to support Richard M. Daley in the 1983 mayoral primary even as Harold Washington, a fellow African-American, entered the race: "I'd made my commitment," Stroger recounted, "and I had no reason to change." He smiled. Criticism? So what. Even in his recent absence, the granite constancy of John Stroger has outclassed the shabby opportunism of the lesser pols who hovered like vultures over the final months of his career. They conspired among themselves and misled voters, scheming to embezzle his personal clout as his grasp on it slipped away. Now he departs, taking with him a possession that can't be begged, borrowed or bequeathed. What he wanted most in return for his work was people's respect. He has it. He always will.
 

President of the County Board

All the local political news these days is really about one thing: the Cook County Board.  Sure, there is the aftermath of a federal trial regarding the Daley administration and an investigation regarding the Blagojevich administration, but if you want to see passion and excitement, the only game in town is the County Board.  Raw politics.  Raw emotion. Raw power. Chicago style, for better or worse.

There is a great deal of posturing and positioning going on, some of it for the interim presidency of the Board, some of it for the Democratic nomination for this November's election and some for the County Board President's election in 2010.

As Committeeman, I have the responsibility to vote to fill any vacancy that occurs after the primary election.  As I understand it, is a responsibility dictated by state law.  All 80 Cook County Democratic Committeeman will share in this responsibility.  I have received, spoken with and/or thought about several candidates.  Some are in the race overtly, while others are covertly interested.  I have heard and seen sentiment for several candidates, and I have not yet decided who I will support.  My criteria is simple.  I will be making a decision based on who has the best vision for the county government.  I believe the next president must be committed to supporting the essential services of the county, and not balancing the budget on the backs of the poor, hungry, homeless and ill.

As in every election, it is a decision about leadership, goals and direction.  I believe that public safety and public health are the most important missions for county government.  There will be many different opinions about who is best suited to serve, but the vision I am looking for is not about politics and posturing.  It is about providing the best and most efficient care to the neediest people of this county, and providing as much safety, security and justice as possible.  John Stroger holds that view as a core and fundamental belief, and it shaped his vision for the county.  That is why I supported him for re-election.  Those same factors will govern my decision on whom to support to fill John Stroger's vacancy on the November ballot.

A few have been touting Forrest Claypool because he came in second.  I like him.  He was a bright and thoughtful candidate, and I expect we have not seen the last of him.  The simple and unavoidable truth, however, is that the majority of Cook County voters in the March primary did not share his vision for the county.  I don't subscribe to the theory that merely coming in second entitles you to a vacancy.  Many Dorothy Brown supporters were disappointed when Mayor Daley didn't appoint her City Treasurer after Miriam Santos, the woman who defeated her for that office, was convicted in federal court.  Rather than claim she was somehow "entitled" to be City Treasurer, Brown instead ran for Clerk of the Circuit Court, took her case to the people, and won that election overwhelmingly. 

Frankly, I doubt that Claypool will seek to be a candidate for the party vacancy.  On the other hand, he very well could be a candidate for the interim Presidency.  I don't have a vote in that race, but given the situation the county is in, it would be good for both the county and Forrest Claypool if he takes that job, and it may position him well if he decides to fun for County Board President again in 2010. 

Finally, we do not have a perfect County government, nor will we with whomever is the next Board President.  Changes will come and improvements will happen slowly in any case.  Most important, we should remember that government is there to serve the common good.  It is a mission that requires good leadership, a strong sense of direction and, most importantly, a vision of where we are going and why we are going there. That is what we need in a President of the Cook County Board and that is who I will support.

Life Is Precious

It has been a long while since I last posted something here.  To those who seem to believe that the world of blogs is the only way life happens that would mean I have been doing nothing.  Of course that is not the case.  We have been busy working on getting our summer plans together, holding our monthly meetings and of course closely following the events that are shaping up our November ticket.

But today I am moved to write because I have been inspired by a subject that surrounds and touches us all. That would be death.

Death surrounds two people I know, one you have all heard much about, George Dunne, and one you have heard nothing about, Joseph L. Smith.  Both leave me feeling like I am losing something more that a life.  Let me share.

George Dunne died and was buried this week past.  I knew George Dunne in two ways: as the President of the Cook County Board, a guy in the paper who was a political power house from the time I was a kid and the man who gave me a start in my career as a health care professional.  The second way I came to know George Dunne was as a fellow committeeman.  As a thirty year old new committeeman in 1993 George Dunne was legendary.  He was a former Chairman of the Cook County Democratic Party, a brave man who stood with Harold Washington when he won the primary, and a guy who ran the county government for as long a Daley had been Mayor.

It was humbling to sit as an equal with a man you had seen growing up shape this city into what it was.  The really nice thing was that George always went out of his way to make the new kid from the Northside feel welcome.  Even though we both knew that I came from a ward that would never be like his and that our politics were in some ways worlds apart I was made to feel one of the guys.  Those first couple of years I watched all of my fellow committeemen and tried to learn everything I could from each of them.  The respect they showed George was immense and when someone would say during a difficult time “George, what do you think?”, some of the people we think of today as great leaders would stop whatever they were saying and listen.  We all listened to George and we all respected his words of wisdom.

I think we have already seen that over time the Central Committee has changed.  The dynamics that made it invincible are going and in many cases gone.  The passing of George Dunne reminds me of the days of 80 pieces working towards one goal, a unity we now seem to be able achieve only in Novembers these days.

So who is Joe Smith?  In all of are lives we have meet someone named Joe Smith, but the Joe Smith I am speaking of is not the same one you are thinking of.  When it real comes down to it very few people know my Joe Smith and those few who do would be very unlikely to be reading a blog or even a computer.  My Joe Smith is an 82 year old man, born in poorest part of Mobile, Alabama before the Great Depression.  It was difficult for him to tell you when the depression started or ended because in his home life was always in the depression.

When he was 18 years and 9 months as he likes to tell it, Joe Smith moved up north.  He came through Chicago on his way to Detroit and he never left.  He met his soon to be wife Minnie shortly after getting here and married her without knowing that he would be fortunate to spend the next 55 years with her.  He took various jobs doing what he could.  He wasn’t a well educated man but that shouldn’t be understood to mean he was dumb because he wasn’t.  Finally after a couple of years, he caught a break and got on with the Chicago Board of Education as a janitor.  After he had been there for years and years the opportunity came up to be a fireman for the heating system and he went to night school with guys half his age so that he could make for a better life.  Over time Joe went to work each day, went to church on Sundays and spent his life doing the right this society calls on a man to do.  He and Minnie grew old and the time came after a lifetime of commitment to the schools to retire.

Joe and Minnie had some good years retired until suddenly out of nowhere one day Minnie became ill and within days she passed.  For the first time in more than 50 years Joe was alone, but he went on with life, kept going to church, and even became a deacon.  He spent his days helping those in need at the church, kept up his little house and yard, traveled home once a year to Alabama, voted, paid taxes and enjoyed life as best he could alone. Joe and Minnie never had any kids unfortunately, but he did have a favorite great niece he thought of as a daughter who had followed his path many years latter and left that same part of Alabama and came to Chicago.  She moved in with him and stayed there until she became my bride.

A couple of year ago Joe was diagnosed with emphysema.  Like most smokers he had smoked a life time, 45 years.  He quickly quit and all was reasonably well until just after the first of the year when he started having more problems breathing.  In March it became clear that something was seriously wrong and after tests and more tests he was diagnosed with lung cancer.  Since then Joe, or as we know him, Uncle Joe, has been living with my wife Tanya and I.  Many people, doctors, nurses and others continue to tell us how unusual that is, but how else could it be?  He needed his family and we were it.

For all of April and most of May Uncle Joe had radiation and chemo.  Both ended before they were supposed to, never a good sign, because he was too sick to take it.  Faster than the cancer itself the treatment was killing him.  We have been through some difficult times over the past two months.  The Fire department knows us now because of the many ambulance visits.  People at the hospital and the pharmacy know us as well.  The doctor who was treating him for the cancer was great and kept us hopeful, so it came as a harsh blow when but the doctor covering for the weekend told us that this was a time to make him comfortable when we were asking him about making him better.  Things had changed quickly and it was a cold shot of reality delivered in an unexpected way.  “Its time to start looking for a Hospice” without any warning was a hard blow.

So we were faced with the decision of home hospice or a skilled care center, i.e. nursing home, became our choices if you can call it a choice.  Our health care system in the U.S. has one path for your basic working family because unless you have great wealth or a great of time home is not an option.  Hospice requires 24 hours a day, 7 days a week care for the patient.  Most of it could be done by untrained friends or family, but realistically for how long?  No employer is going to give you however long it takes.  No individual could do it alone.  And after taking a look around at who was really available to help we now understand why everyone kept saying that not everyone would agree to do this for someone.

So one day this week Uncle Joe will become a resident of one of our neighborhood nursing homes.  The people at the home will become another group of people who come to know us well as we travel the last miles of his journey through life.  The Hospice team will come and make sure he is as comfortable as possible, although they cannot make it as comfortable as being in his own home would be.  And during his stay, we will spend all of his life savings in a couple of months.  During those two months we will be selling his little home and his car to pay a few more months and finally, a man who worked his entire life and did everything the way he was suppose to, will lose everything he spent his life working for and end up on public aid with a thirty dollar a month allowance from the nursing home.  Something is profoundly wrong with that system.  Its hard to be angry that his life was too short or that he had so much life to do, but it is very upsetting that somehow he can’t die at his home where he wants to.  Something needs to change, but in reality most Americans have little concern for how we die.  Its uncomfortable to think about and so far away.  That is too bad.

Given what is going on in my life, perhaps it will be a while before I post again.  I have not forgotten you, I am tending to more important business.  Bloging is not a necessity even in this bloging gone wild world.  I am reachable by email (davidfagus@49thward.com) or phone, (773) 973-4949.  If you need something I am here and easily found.

Qualified Judges for Cook County

Seeking out good judges is a difficult task.  All too often voters enter the poll without a good knowledge of even who the judges are, let alone their experience, background and the evaluation of their abilities by their peers.  The Democratic Party of the 49th Ward believes that the most important factor in becoming a judge is experience practicing law.   There are man who can and do have a good political background, buit we put our faith in those that have the best legal experiences.

That is why we work hard to endorses and support judicial candidates that will make good judges, not good candidates.  All of the candidates we are supporting in this primary election have stood in front of their professional colleauges, put their record out for examination and have stood the test of review by the two leading bar associations in Chicago.  Some are qualified, some highly or well qualified.  Not every race offers "Highly" or "Well", but many do offer "Not Recommended" or "Not Qualified".  If you know who you like, good for you.  If you don'yt know and want some strongly  recommended candidates print the list that follows and take it into the voting both with you on Tuesday, March 21, 2006.

Candidate                                  Chicago Council            Chicago Bar            Punch/
                                                    of Lawyers                    Association             Mark
Michael James Murphy           Well Qualified               Qualified                   53
Joy Virginia   Cunningham      Well Qualified               Qualified                   61
Ann Collins   Dole                      Well Qualified               Highly Qualified      66
Michael J.   Howlett, Jr.           Well Qualified               Qualified                  70
Mike McHale                             Qualified                        Qualified                  72
James Patrick   Murphy          Qualified                        Qualified                  73
Thomas J.   Byrne                     Qualified                        Qualified                  81
Martha Mills                              Highly Qualified            Highly Qualified     84

You can, by law, take this into the voting booth with you to use as a guide.  Please do so.  These recommendations are good for all Democratic ballots in Cook County regardless of ward or township.

Support for Illinois Health Care Referendum 2006

Many have asked about the Health Care referendum on the ballot so here is my response.  The Democratic Party of the 49th Ward has been working with the folks organizing the Illinois Health Care Referendum 2006 for some time now.  We are supportive of the idea.  We have made posts here and have spoken with others to insure that this initative will get on the ballot for November . . . yes November.   That continues the timeline set by the leaders of the referendum. 

In order to avoid confussion we will not be list it on our materials for the March 21, 2006 election because it is not going to be on that ballot.  In April, a representative will be featured at our monthly meeting and they will be sharing information about the initative.  They will also be asking us to circulate petitions to get it on the ballot.  I would hearily encourage you to support this initative and to do the work it requires to get on the ballot. 

Lets also be careful though and take our elections one election at a time.

David Fagus

Judge Candidate Is Impressive

The following is quoted from Laura Washington article (27 Feb 06)  about our one of our judicial candidates and speaks very well of the quality of people our organization thinks should be on the bench

Joy Cunningham is their inaugural project. They've already picked a winner. Cunningham is running in the March 21 primary for a seat on the Illinois Appellate Court. She is the only person of color in a five-way race. A la Barack Obama, she boasts exquisite credentials: Cunningham is general counsel for Northwestern Memorial Hospital, a former Cook County judge, assistant attorney general, appellate court clerk, and former president of the Chicago Bar Association. She should be a slam dunk. Yet, a la Obama, and many other minority candidates, she wasn't slated by the Democratic Party. The bosses favor candidates who are loyal to the party, not to the people. Sometimes, it seems, only hacks need apply.

"I  [Cunningham] have put together a much, much wider base of support than just black/brown. My endorsements come from a broad spectrum of constituencies." She notes backing from an array of Chicago's top business executives, labor unions, gays and lesbians, as well as other elected officials from Rep. Jan Schakowsky to Rep. Danny K. Davis.


Please don't stop short.  Get to the bottom of the ballot and make sure we have a diverse and well qualified judiciary.  If you need help look to our endorsements.