49th Ward Democratic Committeeman




Subscribe

  • Bloglines is a subscription service that allows you to get a world of information from daily newspapers to blogs like this one in one place. Try it and it will change your Internet life.

Thank You for Visiting!


« December 2005 | Main | February 2006 »

Laura Washington Speaks on County Board Race

Laura Washington   of the   Chicago Sun-Times

Stroger clout, loyalty leave Claypool drowning

January 16, 2006

When Forrest Claypool looks at himself in the mirror (and I hear that's quite often), he indubitably sees the next president of the Cook County Board. Undoubtedly, he's fooling himself.

There are 10 weeks left in his Democratic primary faceoff with board President John Stroger. Claypool has been raising money for more than a year -- close to $1 million at last count. His fund-raising prowess TKO'ed fellow Cook County Commissioner Mike Quigley's selfsame campaign. They calculated, correctly, that two white reformers in the race would cancel each other out.

Claypool's got the right message. It's time to reform the county's bloated government and fix its broken bureaucracy. In a public policy speech last week before the City Club of Chicago, he railed against "unconscionable deaths" at the county's Provident Hospital on Chicago's South Side. He noted that the Illinois attorney general is investigating "beatings and riots" at the county's Juvenile Detention Center. He argues that Stroger's administration is "built on the "friends and family plan," where connections trump qualifications.

He's right. As someone who's long had friends and family languish at County and Provident -- black folks, poor folks -- I know we can do a lot better.

On paper, Claypool's resume is golden. His blue-chip campaign committee, headed by Quigley, sports a slew of good-government goo-goos, including my old buddy, Tom "Don Quixote" Geoghegan.

So why is the Claypool campaign calcified? Despite "all his failings," Ald. Ricardo Munoz told me, Munoz's 22nd Ward Organization is down with Stroger. The new Stroger Hospital is a top priority for Latinos, and the president "is a true advocate for health care in Cook County."

Munoz, who leans independent, argues that Claypool's stint as a slasher of Chicago Park District jobs "doesn't bode well" for the delivery of health services to the poor. "I shudder to think about what a Claypool administration could do to the health care system."

Claypool can't count on gays and lesbians, many of whom populate his North Side territory. That's because Stroger is a longtime and unwavering advocate for their rights, says Rick Garcia, political director for Equality Illinois, the state's leading gay rights group. Garcia and most of his board are backing the incumbent. "There's a very, very long history there," Garcia says. "What's the line? 'You dance with the one who brought you.' ''

Stroger Hospital has been "the place of last resort" for gays, especially those seeking HIV treatment, according to Garcia. "President Stroger organically understands the importance of that in a way that Claypool does not."

Garcia is not the first to note that Claypool, an aloof policy wonk, is "not a dynamic candidate." He wonders, "outside of his own base, who knows him?"

On Chicago's South and West sides, Stroger is the political grandpappy who has boosted many a career and doled out hundreds of jobs. John Paul Jones, chairman of the Greater Englewood Community and Family Task Force, says: "People are going for Stroger. Claypool is not exposed to the larger public in the African-American community."

Blacks know Claypool best for his tenure as Mayor Daley's chief of staff. He was Daley's pick to run the Chicago Park District, where he slashed 1,000 jobs. "He was so close to the Daley administration. People still see him as an administration man," Jones notes.

That's a tragic irony for Claypool, since Daley and his sibling, Cook County Commissioner John Daley, will pull out all the stops to keep him out of the president's seat.

Claypool's steering committee is dominated by North Shore and lakefront whites. He has corralled all of three -- count 'em -- endorsements from county elected officials: Aldermen Eugene Schulter (47th), Mary Ann Smith (48th) and Rey Colon (35th). Three bold souls.

A reform campaign that doesn't have significant black, Latino and gay support can forget it.

Claypool campaign manager Marj Halperin says it's still early in the run-up to the March 21 primary, and more endorsements are on the way. Quigley is working to bring his posse into the Claypool fold. Halperin says her candidate is reaching out countywide to "people who rely on the county for health care, people who care about how the criminal justice system is administered, and people who care about how their tax dollars are spent."

She assures me that Claypool plans to visit some African-American churches this month.

To the voters, clout and loyalty count more than newspaper endorsements, white papers and blue-ribbon committees. The mood in the 'hood says that once an office goes black, it never goes back.

The message is on target. The messenger needs some work. 

IVI-IPO Endorsements

The IVI-IPO held its county and state office endorsements on Saturday, January 14, 2006.  The results listed below and comments are unofficial. They reflect my personal view of how events turned through the day.  It is not meant to be a transcript, minutes or in anyway official.

The Republicans offices were first on the agenda.  With approximately 25 people in attendance, Steve Rauschenberger and Sandy Wegmen appeared for the Lt. Governor post.  This was a battle of the polished ultra conservative versus the regular ultra conservative.  In the end, while neither truly reflects the core values of IVI-IPO, Steve Rauschenberger was endorsed.  As a side note, it took all of 2.5 minutes to realize why I am a Democrat.  That was even hard to sit through let alone believe in.  Because the number voting was too low this was only a recommendation  to the state Board.  The Board did endorse Rauschenberger.

In the Republican race for Governor three candidates appeared: Andy Martin, Jim Oberweis and Judy Baar Topinka.  Topinka made a solid presentation highlighting some of the things she has agreed with IVI-IPO about, but it is clear from her responses on the questionnaire that she is running in a conservative primary.  Topinka was endorsed by a sizable margin.  Again be cause of the total number of members present this was a recommendation to the state Board.  The Board did endorse Topinka.

The rest of the day was left for the Democrats.  First up were candidates for State Treasurer.  Alexander Giannoulias was the only candidate to appear.  He spoke at length of his experience in banking and the relationship that banking experience has with being the State Treasurer.  Touting the support of Barack Obama and congressional members’ Jan Schakowsky and Jesse Jackson, Jr., Giannoulias rolled to a decisive victory over Paul Mangieri.  The vote total for this race was, I believe, less than 45 members present.  This race was close to the number need for a binding vote, but fell a few members short of binding so it was a recommendation to the Board.  The Board endorsed Giannoulias.

The big race of the day was the County Board Presidency.  Both John Stroger and Forrest Claypool appeared.  Also appearing out of nowhere were approximately 50 precinct captains from a couple of north side ward organizations who were there to support Forrest Claypool.  The total for this race was 122 voting members.  Both Claypool and Stroger made their comments and answered the questions from the crowd.  The highly partisan crowd clapped and cheered for their favorite and when they were done the first motion was made.   Stroger was nominated for endorsement.  That motion failed.  The second motion to endorse Claypool passed 73-40 with 9 abstentions.  This was a binding endorsement to the Board.   The precinct captains, known as "packies" to the core IVI-IPO membership, voted in lock step with Claypool.  (“Packies", by the way, are persons who join the organization solely for the purpose of voting in endorsement sessions.)   Nobody will ever know how it would have gone without this influence, but it undoubtedly would have been closer or may have even have gone for Stroger.  Somewhere near 50 votes, or even 40, are a lot of votes out of 73.

After the big vote, a significant number (25-30?) of the 'packies" left, thereby confirming their single candidate interest.  The Metropolitan Water Reclamation District was next.  Many of the candidates appeared.  They included Shore, O'Brien, Harris, Pederson, Maragos, Powell, Stefanski and Avila.   The first motion, made by the remaining "packies", was to endorse Maragos, Shore, and O'Brien.   This was their ticket.  The vote was very close, 46 in favor and 49 against.  With that failure, the "packie" population declined again, (5-10?).  The "packies" then moved to making individual endorsements rather than a “slate” and nominated Deb Shore.  Shore won the most impressive win of the day with an 81-0 vote in her favor.  Next the "packies" moved to endorse Terry O'Brien.  While closer, O'Brien won a binding endorsement with a comfortable margin large enough to gain him a binding endorsement.  There were several nominations that followed for Avila, Harris and Powell that all failed with votes in the 20's in favor and near 50 opposed.   Finally, one of the "packies" was recognized and motioned that the IVI-IPO endorse Dean Maragos.  Maragos was endorsed with a vote of 47-36 which was not enough to be binding.  The Board reviewed this decision and in its wisdom decided to support both Maragos and Powell.  This makes the endorsed candidates for the MWRD to be Shore, O'Brien, Maragos and Powell.

You may be wondering how there are four candidates in a three position race.  The answer is that IVI-IPO rules allow for more than one candidate per seat to be endorsed.

The final race of the day was the race for Sheriff.  Both Baker and Dart appeared, made presentations and answered questions.  I do not remember the final total (42-20 something I think), but the victory for Dart was sizable.  Many of the long term members as well as the "packies" were supportive of Tom Dart and he received a binding endorsement.

It was a long day, as always, at the IVI-IPO endorsement session.