« December 2004 | Main | February 2005 »

Howard Dean Running For DNC Chair

The following is Howard Dean's announcement that he is running to be Chairman of the DNC.  I like Howard Dean, but I am not convinced that the way to win is to preach harder to the choir in order to wake up those people who are not currently participating in the process and get them to vote.  It sounds a lot like the Barry Goldwater/"Silent Majority" stratagy of the 1964 campaign. 

Of course, as we do well locally, registration and participation building activities are vital, but the philosophy that we will energize the sleeping liberal base and have them all vote in the next election is unreasonably optimistic.  I do like Dean's enthusiasm and his charisma, but if yu go back and look at his position on issues he is not quite the liberal we all believe he is.

My biggest concern isn't his political philosophy, but the perception, wrongly created by the media, that Howard Dean is crazy.  It is very hard to convince people that your party is right when the leader is percieved as having a credibility problem.

With Dean in the race the dynamics will change.  We will have a newly elected leader in February. 

The field of announced candidates is:

Howard Dean, Former Vermont Governor

Martin Frost, Texas Congressman

Wellington Webb, former mayor of Denver

Simon B. Rosenberg, New Democratic Network founder

Donnie Fowler, Democratic Party strategist

Considering entering the race is:

James J. Blanchard, former Michigan governor

Timothy J. Roemer, a former Indiana congressman

Being urged to enter the race is:

Terry McAuliffe, Current DNC Chairman

Who do you think it should be?


Howard Dean's statement:


As I have traveled across our country, I have talked to thousands of people who are working for change in their own communities about the power of politics to make a difference in their own lives and in the lives of others. Every group I have spoken to, I encouraged them to stand up for what they believe and to get involved in the electoral process -- because the only sure way to make difference is to step up and run for office yourself.

Today, I'm announcing my candidacy for the Chairmanship of the Democratic National Committee.

The Democratic Party needs a vibrant, forward-thinking, long-term presence in every single state and we must be willing to contest every race at every level. We will only win when we show up and fight for the issues important to all of us.

Another integral part of our strategy must be cultivating the party's grassroots. Our long term success depends on all of us taking an active role in our party and in the political process, by volunteering, going door to door and taking the Democratic message into every community, and by organizing at the local level. After all, new ideas and new leaders don't come from consultants; they come from communities.

As important as organization is, it alone can no longer win us elections. Offering a new choice means making Democrats the party of reform -- reforming America's financial situation, reforming our electoral process, reforming health care, reforming education and putting morality back in our foreign policy. The Democratic Party will not win elections or build a lasting majority solely by changing its rhetoric, nor will we win by adopting the other side's positions. We must say what we mean -- and mean real change when we say it.

But most of all, together, we have to rebuild the American community. We will never succeed by treating our nation as a collection of separate regions or separate groups. There are no red states or blues states, only American states. And we must talk to the people in all of these states as members of one community.

That word -- 'values' -- has lately become a codeword for appeasement of the right-wing fringe. But when political calculations make us soften our opposition to bigotry, or sign on to policies that add to the burden of ordinary Americans, we have abandoned our true values.

We cannot let that happen. And we cannot just mouth the words. Our party must speak plainly and our agenda must clearly reflect the socially progressive, fiscally responsible values that bring our party -- and the vast majority of Americans -- together.

All of this will require both national perspective and local experience. I know what it's like to lead hands-on at the state level and I know what it's like to run for national office.

With your help, this past election season, Democracy for America, already started creating the kind of organization the Democratic Party can be. This past election cycle, we endorsed over 100 candidates at all levels of government -- from school board to U.S. Senate. We contributed almost a million dollars to nearly 750 candidates around the country and raised millions of dollars for many more candidates.

Together, we helped elect a Democratic governor in Montana, a Democratic mayor of Salt Lake County, Utah and an African American woman to the bench in Alabama. Fifteen of the candidates we endorsed had never run for office before -- and won.

I also have experience building and managing a local party organization. My career started as Democratic Party chair in Chittenden County, Vermont. I then ran successful campaigns: for state legislature, lieutenant governor and then governor. In my 11-year tenure as governor, I balanced the state's budget every year.

I served as chair of both the National Governors' Association and the Democratic Governors' Association (DGA). And as chair of the DGA, I helped recruit nearly 20 governors that won -- even in states like Alabama, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina and Mississippi.

All of these experiences have only reaffirmed what I know to be true. There is only one party that speaks to the hopes and dreams of all Americans. It is the party you have already given so much to. It is the Democratic Party.

We can win elections only by standing up for what we believe.

Thank you and I look forward to listening to your concerns in the weeks ahead.

Governor Howard Dean, M.D.

January Political Meeting:
County Budget Battle - 2005 Edition

This year the battle over the Cook County government budget seems to have the potential to be even more explosive than last years fight.  Cook County is the third largest county in the United States and is the second largest governmental body in the State of Illinois.  With a budget of $889 million dollars one could wonder where it all goes and why a tax increase is needed. 

President Stroger has presented his "President's Recommendations", the vision and blueprint for 2005 County government spending.  Our Commissioners, Larry Suffredin north of Pratt and Mike Quigley, south of Pratt, have been invited to join us to discuss this vitally important topic on Monday, January 24, 2005.

Please join us at 6:30 pm for refreshment and networking and stay for our featured guests at 7:30 pm.

Campache Restaurant
7124 N. Clark
Monday, January 24, 2005
Banquet Room

Have questions?   email for answers.

Cid_image001Please also remember that if you are going to the Bulls game with us your $21 per ticket, (half price) is due at the end of this meeting.  Need more info, click here.

Alberto Gonzales: The Ultimate “Yes” Man

The testimony of Alberto Gonzales brought something to light that I had not considered: the impact of “Yes” men.  The Bush administration is known for having a single consistent message for nearly every topic.  They pride themselves on staying consistent with one message and for continuously being on that message.  It is one approach of many, but it is the trademark of Karl Rove, Senior Advisor to the President and otherwise known as “Bush’s Brain”.

People who work for a President, particularly at the White House senior staff level, have one thing in common.  Regardless of philosophy, ideology or any other "ology" they are smart people.  Smart people can be smart in different ways though.  One likes to think of the Kennedy administration as the gathering of great minds.  A White House so full of ideas it was bursting at the seams so to speak.  Every issue was debated, discussed, revised, rethought and further contemplated.

The Bush White House is different.  There are brilliant people there, but they have applied that brilliance to something else.  Alberto Gonzales, who is one of may who operates as a “Yes” man.  They know the President.  They know his message.  Philosophical debate isn’t necessary since they all agree.  The goal is to shape and protect the message.

The skill of the Bush “Yes” man was discussed at several points during Alberto Gonzales first day of testimony at the Attorney General confirmation hearings.  Senator Russ Fiengold did it best when during his time he was questioning Gonzales about the Texas death penalty cases.  When addressing one of the more troubling cases in the Bush era of death penalty history in Texas Gonzales wrote a final report to the then-Governor Bush for Bush to decide to either precede with the execution or stay the execution.  In this case being questioned by Feingold the defendant was a man sentenced to death while his lawyer slept through the trial.  In his summary, Gonzales didn’t even mention this fact.  It is very troubling that in a report that will be the man’s last chance for life the most important fact of the case was omitted from the Governor’s report, but this shows the reason Gonzales is the ultimate “Yes” man.

As a very bright lawyer, Alberto Gonzales knows how to summarize a case, without question.  But Bush was a man who had a solid anticrime position and would not allow himself to be seen as weak on crime or criminals.  Knowing that Bush would not stop the death, Gonzales shaped the facts to protect the decision Bush made.  There was no proof that Bush was aware or unaware of the mitigating circumstances.  There was no reason to be concerned.  The facts as presented would not interfere with the Bush staying on message regarding crime and criminals.

This approach was evident again in the report Gonzales wrote to support the policy that allowed torture to occur on the terrorist detainees. 

Now he is supposed to lead the Justice Department.  Does anyone believe that he will suddenly become a voice independence and champion of the citizen?  This is just one of many things we feared would come true if Bush was elected President, and it is a big one.